Monday, May 27, 2019
Asteroids vs. Comets
Asteroids vs. Comets Spacecrafts drop retrieved extraordinarily valuable information that has furthered the human races knowledge of what exists in outer billet. However, ballistic capsules and shuttles atomic number 18 extremely expensive to build and launch into space so they should be well taken care of. Sending a spacecraft to an asteroid is uttermost better and safer than sending a spacecraft to a comet for quite a few different reasons. First, an asteroid is made up of little materials than a comet. Next, comets modernize two tails when approaching the Sun.Lastly, an asteroids orbit is much more predictable than a comets orbit. With these characteristics, asteroids make a better objective for spacecrafts to land on rather than comets. A typical asteroid is made up of rock, metal, and iron. The iron causes asteroids to be rock solid with some loose set up of rubble. Comets consist of many different materials such as ice and form. With less exposed materials, sending a s pacecraft to an asteroid instead of a comet reduces unheralded obstacles with the comets atmospheric conditions.Having an atmosphere with high levels of water and dust great deal also make the spacecrafts maneuvering difficult. An asteroid would be much more suitable for spacecraft maneuvering due to its rocky and dry shell. Comets produce two tails when they get closer to the Sun while asteroids produce no tails. These two tails consist of one white tail made of dust and an opposite blue tail containing ionized gas. The Suns light-colored creates radiation pressure and when mixed with solar wind, they push the dust and gas outward and away from the Sun thus creating the two tails.Exposing a spacecraft to these conditions can be very detrimental to the exterior and technology of the spacecraft. Which would be very counterproductive and could potentially destroy any evidence recorded. Asteroids, however, are basically outsized piles of rubble with craters. Spacecrafts would have a much easier time landing on an asteroid as opposed to a comet. Asteroids come from the inner solar system and have a very predictable orbit. All asteroids orbit between Mars and Jupiter in the asteroid belt around the Sun.Some comets may have a predictable orbit, however, there are many ways a comet may be knocked off course. Comets come from the outer solar system where other objects or even passing stars can cause the comet to have a different orbit. Having a more predictable orbit would make a spacecraft mission much easier to map and plan out. It costs around $300 million to send a spacecraft on a mission to space on an interplanetary mission. In this case, asteroids are much better for a spacecraft to take a mission to.Asteroids are made up of less materials that contribute to a dangerous climate which is much more suitable for a spacecraft to maneuver around on. Second, comets produce two tails containing dust and ionized gas which would make it difficult to land a spacecraf t on. Last, asteroids have a very predictable orbit while comets can be harder to track and plan a mission to. Asteroids clearly have better qualities for a spacecraft to be sent to.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.